Pádraig Brady wrote: > It's not worth replacing strptime to support %q, at least until it's > available in glibc.
OK. > Currently there is no strptime unit test. Ah, right. Sorry for the noise then. Bruno
Pádraig Brady wrote: > It's not worth replacing strptime to support %q, at least until it's > available in glibc.
OK. > Currently there is no strptime unit test. Ah, right. Sorry for the noise then. Bruno