On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Pino Toscano <ptosc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 14:14:34 CEST Jim Meyering wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Pino Toscano <ptosc...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:15:18 CEST Pino Toscano wrote: >> >> as discussed in [1], this series adds a new getprogname module. >> >> All it does is providing a getprogname function, much like what is >> >> found on e.g. *BSD systems, and using it in gnulib instead of progname. >> >> Also, using it explicitly by modules avoids gnulib users the need of >> >> either use the progname module (GPL), or to provide program_name (and >> >> call set_program_name manually, which is not always doable). >> >> >> >> Caveat: the progname is left as it is, so set_program_name will still >> >> affect program_name but not what error will use. >> >> >> >> (Please note it's my first big patch to gnulib, so bear with me for >> >> anything wrong/missing.) >> >> >> >> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00048.html >> >> To anyone else wondering, here is a link to the patches: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00081.html > > There's also more discussion about that prior of my patch sending, > always in the same month. > >> Sorry about the delay. >> Pino, would you please rebase and repost the series? That way, anyone >> who attempts to apply it is much less likely to have to deal with >> conflicts. > > Sure, just done.
Thank you. I will make an effort to review it in the next week.
