On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 14:14:34 CEST Jim Meyering wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Pino Toscano <ptosc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday, 29 March 2016 14:15:18 CEST Pino Toscano wrote: > >> as discussed in [1], this series adds a new getprogname module. > >> All it does is providing a getprogname function, much like what is > >> found on e.g. *BSD systems, and using it in gnulib instead of progname. > >> Also, using it explicitly by modules avoids gnulib users the need of > >> either use the progname module (GPL), or to provide program_name (and > >> call set_program_name manually, which is not always doable). > >> > >> Caveat: the progname is left as it is, so set_program_name will still > >> affect program_name but not what error will use. > >> > >> (Please note it's my first big patch to gnulib, so bear with me for > >> anything wrong/missing.) > >> > >> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00048.html > > To anyone else wondering, here is a link to the patches: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2016-03/msg00081.html
There's also more discussion about that prior of my patch sending, always in the same month. > Sorry about the delay. > Pino, would you please rebase and repost the series? That way, anyone > who attempts to apply it is much less likely to have to deal with > conflicts. Sure, just done. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
