Hi Bruno, > Cool. Yes, please, show it!
Ok, it's following this reply. I'm sure that it's not ready for inclusion just yet, but I'll polish it until it is using the feedback I receive. As always, comments and criticisms welcomed. > It can also be done later by someone else who is more familiar with > Win32 programming. We prefer a module with missing mingw or Cygwin > support to a module that does not exist at all. Ok, that would be fine with me too. > In summary, here you don't need the wrapper function when the > function is not already declared. Thanks for that breakdown. It was very enlightening. Thanks -Ben
