On Wednesday 05 October 2011 17:31:07 Jim Meyering wrote: > Bruno Haible wrote: > > Jim Meyering wrote: > >> I propose to push Kamil's fix (mainly to have a record of it, > >> in case we need it later), but then to immediately revert it > >> along with the file-has-acl.c change that started this. > >> That seems to be the right thing to do, going forward, > >> since the kernel folks have recently reverted the behavior > >> that motivated the earlier file-has-acl.c patch. > >> Any objections? > > > > Fine with me. > > > >> (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720325#c24) > > > > Good to see that the kernel people are considering the issue seriously. > > Thanks, Kamil, for having pulled Ian Kent into the discussion. > > Thanks for the feedback, Bruno. I've pushed that to gnulib.
Cool. I need to provide no additional test-cases for this. Problem solved. Kamil
