Bruno Haible wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> I propose to push Kamil's fix (mainly to have a record of it, >> in case we need it later), but then to immediately revert it >> along with the file-has-acl.c change that started this. >> That seems to be the right thing to do, going forward, >> since the kernel folks have recently reverted the behavior >> that motivated the earlier file-has-acl.c patch. >> Any objections? > > Fine with me. > >> (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720325#c24) > > Good to see that the kernel people are considering the issue seriously. > Thanks, Kamil, for having pulled Ian Kent into the discussion.
Thanks for the feedback, Bruno. I've pushed that to gnulib.
