On 09/28/2010 01:40 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
Doing it as a "system" module looks good to me, too.I have a qualm about the generic name "system" for such a specialized module; perhaps "system-posix" instead? But this is a minor quibble.
The module name system accurately reflects that it is for the system(3) library call; the unfortunate name of the library call is more to blame here :)
-- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
