On 09/28/10 07:58, Jim Meyering wrote: > However, if someone can come up with a patch that is relatively > noninvasive, maybe... It's hard to say without seeing just how > big a change would be required.
How about this patch? (I hope it's noninvasive enough. :-) stdlib: don't depend on sys_wait * modules/stdlib (Depends-on): Remove sys_wait, as the dependency is not really needed. See the thread rooted here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-09/msg00454.html diff --git a/modules/stdlib b/modules/stdlib index f822aa3..489f70a 100644 --- a/modules/stdlib +++ b/modules/stdlib @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ c++defs include_next stddef stdint -sys_wait unistd warn-on-use
