Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> writes: > On 21 September 2010 13:38, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: >> Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> writes: >> >>> 1. The example Makefile.am code has "lib/" rather than "src/" in the >>> path to the source code, even though it's clearly the package source >>> that is to be analysed, not the gnulib library code. >> >> This is because it is an example, and the projects I used it for had the >> "real" code in lib/ (and the gnulib code in gl/ or similar). Maybe the >> example could be changed to use src/ as that may be more common, but >> still, it is an example snippet that needs to be adapted by the >> maintainer anyway... > > Indeed. Maybe src/ is rather commoner as a source directory? > > Attached, two patches, one to s/lib/src/ and one to fix a typo that an > earlier patch somehow introduced (s/PACKAG/PACKAGE/). Sorry about the > latter.
Thanks, applied. In the future, please also write a ChangeLog entry. /Simon
