On 21 September 2010 13:38, Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > Reuben Thomas <r...@sc3d.org> writes: > >> 1. The example Makefile.am code has "lib/" rather than "src/" in the >> path to the source code, even though it's clearly the package source >> that is to be analysed, not the gnulib library code. > > This is because it is an example, and the projects I used it for had the > "real" code in lib/ (and the gnulib code in gl/ or similar). Maybe the > example could be changed to use src/ as that may be more common, but > still, it is an example snippet that needs to be adapted by the > maintainer anyway...
Indeed. Maybe src/ is rather commoner as a source directory? Attached, two patches, one to s/lib/src/ and one to fix a typo that an earlier patch somehow introduced (s/PACKAG/PACKAGE/). Sorry about the latter. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org
0001-Set-cut_dir-properly-and-add-mode-line-for-Emacs.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-Use-src-not-lib-as-root-of-source-in-example-Makefil.patch
Description: Binary data
