Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > Eric Blake <e...@byu.net> writes: >> Coreutils seems like it may be the better project to drive this effort >> of trying to merge its maint.mk with gnulib, in order to provide a >> single maint.mk file useful across multiple projects. > > Ok. How many are using maint.mk from gnulib? My plan would be to > remove as much as possible from gnulib's maint.mk that conflicts with > what's in maint.mk, and then make coreutils use gnulib's maint.mk (with > its old rules moved to cfg.mk). Then gradually rules can be moved from > coreutils cfg.mk to gnulib's maint.mk when they have been reviewed as > being non-coreutils specific. Thoughts? > > Jim, do you think this plan is a good idea? Would you consider applying > patches against coreutils that implements it?
Hi Simon, Yes, that sounds like a fine approach. Thanks for working on it.
