Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Coreutils seems like it may be the better project to drive this effort > of trying to merge its maint.mk with gnulib, in order to provide a > single maint.mk file useful across multiple projects.
Ok. How many are using maint.mk from gnulib? My plan would be to remove as much as possible from gnulib's maint.mk that conflicts with what's in maint.mk, and then make coreutils use gnulib's maint.mk (with its old rules moved to cfg.mk). Then gradually rules can be moved from coreutils cfg.mk to gnulib's maint.mk when they have been reviewed as being non-coreutils specific. Thoughts? Jim, do you think this plan is a good idea? Would you consider applying patches against coreutils that implements it? /Simon
