Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > To make it clear: > > - Patch 1 only - applies if close_stdout were modified to ignore EPIPE > > always (which Jim has rejected). > > - Patch 1 + 2 combined - applies if close_stdout is as it currently is. > > What's wrong in having patch 1 + 2 combined with close_stdout modified > to ignore EPIPE?
Patch 2 would then be redundant and confusing. Bruno
