Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Is it possible to implement the "tee > --ignore-sigpipe" as you did (delaying SIGPIPE until the last input > closes, which I also think is the right thing to do) while having > close-stream ignore EPIPE?
Yes it is. The complete patch was posted here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2008-09/msg00024.html Bruno