Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <simon <at> josefsson.org> writes: > >> >> Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes: >> >> > I think it would be even simpler to just avoid intprops.h (after all, >> > memchr.c was originally borrowed from glibc, which doesn't have >> > intprops.h). >> >> I like that. > > OK, I've done it for memchr, memrchr, strchrnul, and memchr2 (although the > latter is not in glibc, so that was only for consistency with the other > three).
Seems to work fine here. (Although I don't know any system that doesn't have memchr so I can't test that case fully...) /Simon
