Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it would be even simpler to just avoid intprops.h (after all, > memchr.c was originally borrowed from glibc, which doesn't have > intprops.h).
I like that. Thanks, Simon
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it would be even simpler to just avoid intprops.h (after all, > memchr.c was originally borrowed from glibc, which doesn't have > intprops.h).
I like that. Thanks, Simon