Simon Josefsson wrote: > I needed the following modules under LGPLv2.1+: > > dummy > float > realloc > stdlib > > Any objections to this patch?
No objection. We promised you the ability to do such changes, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-07/msg00155.html > Btw, why is the mnemonic 'LGPLv2+' rather than 'LGPLv2.1+'? Because it's just a shorthand. It's not worth making the distinction between LGPL 2.0 and 2.1 in this context, IMO. Bruno
