Geoff Clare wrote:
Ironically, it is the wording for SSIZE_MAX that is closest to
being right and the others that all need to change, as the wording
in the C Standard is "maximum value for an object of type xxxx".
I still think that's the *worst* wording. "Maximum value of type <foo>"
is to me unambiguous. If you want to be /really/ unambiguous I would
even add the word "representable" to clearly indicate that you are
talking about architecture-mandated limits, not arbitrary OS limits.
--
Matthew
Vs lbh pna ernq guvf jvgubhg fbsgjner, lbh ner n FREVBHF areq! --
Nqncgrq sebz Znggurj Jva (ivz-qri znvyvat yvfg)
