Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> This will keep me from releasing decl-after-stmt code in coreutils/src: >> This inspired me to try harder for an automated check for departures >> from C89. [snip] > > Thanks, both! Since this is the most common C89 deviation (and one that > is usually purely cosmetic and avoided with few or no adverse effects), > I think this will help keep gnulib/coreutils c89 compatible (or at least > compatible with most non-c99 compilers).
FYI, for coreutils/src/*.c you'll still have to apply the patch. This guarantees that the patch does its job.
