Paul Eggert wrote: > Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I could probably do it on > > this box, but since it's Linux, it would still be with gcc. > > Even that would be helpful, since our current buildbot doesn't do the > particular combination of GCC options you're interested in.
I would be happy to add a special-options-build to the buildbot to check for c89 compatibility. I will patch in the c99-to-c89.diff first of course. What options would be required for this? Is "-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror" sufficient? Bob
