Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> It passed "make distcheck" with only one additional kludge. >> The above mistakenly added lib/tmpfile-safer.c to the list, >> even though coreutils doesn't use the file. >> It was pulled in due to this unused macro in stdio-safer.m4: >> >> AC_DEFUN([gl_TMPFILE_SAFER], >> [ >> AC_LIBOBJ([tmpfile-safer]) >> ]) > > Well, the 'tmpfile-safer' module uses this macro.
It is unused by coreutils, hence tmpfile-safer.c should not be distributed. >> I would hate to institutionalize a process that requires us to >> maintain all of these names in two places -- even temporarily. > Wait until tomorrow... Ok. I can wait a few hours :-) That's good to hear. I presume you will soon back out your 3000-line change that just added all of those EXTRA_DIST += ... lines.
