Michael Albinus <michael.albi...@gmx.de> writes:

> I'm happy it works stable now, and I'm reluctant to touch it w/o urgent
> need. That's why I have used the (sit-for 0.005) solution proposed by
> Eli, outside tramp-accept-process-output.

Understood; thanks for elaborating.

-- 
Suhail



Reply via email to