> From: Po Lu <luang...@yahoo.com> > Cc: Stefan Kangas <stefankan...@gmail.com>, m...@bulsara.com, > 71...@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:52:19 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > > >> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankan...@gmail.com> > >> Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 02:48:57 -0700 > >> Cc: m...@bulsara.com, 71...@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > >> > >> > Ping! Should I close this? > >> > >> Shouldn't we rather fix the bug described by Mike? I.e. this: > >> > >> > Setting `pixel-scroll-precision-interpolate-page’ is supposed to > >> > turn off the paging animation (which it does) however even when it’s > >> > off, <prior> and <next> invoke `cua-scroll-up’ & `cua-scroll-down’ > >> > rather than allowing another keymap to handle it. > > > > I don't mind to fixing this, if possible, but (a) I don't think I > > understand what is being suggested by the text you quote above, and > > (b) given Po Lu's response, it doesn't seem like the proposed changes > > will be accepted, or did I miss something? > > My problem is that two years ago I stated quite clearly why it was > inappropriate to engineer paging interpolation into p-s-p-m (in a > Telegram group), to the deaf ears of the mob requesting it, but since it > is only now that we have received a lone complaint, it's safe to > conclude that most users are satisfied with its established behavior, > which should at least give us pause before any decision to tamper with > it some more, and which behavior, mind you, had already been revised > once in response to user feedback before 29.1. The optimal solution is > simply not to bind p-s-p-i-p in pixel-scroll-precision-mode, but users > disagreed then, and now it's far too late to tamper with these bindings.
So what to do with this bug? close as wontfix? leave open and hope someone will find a solution? something else?
