Ping! Should I close this?
> Cc: m...@bulsara.com, 71...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:43:51 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>
>
> > From: Po Lu <luang...@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: m...@bulsara.com, 71...@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:24:28 +0800
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > > Ping!
> > >
> > >> Cc: 71...@debbugs.gnu.org
> > >> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 10:54:54 +0300
> > >> From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>
> > >>
> > >> Po Lu, how can we make some progress here?
> > >>
> > >> > From: Mike Woolley <m...@bulsara.com>
> > >> > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 11:10:15 +0100
> > >> > Cc: Po Lu <luang...@yahoo.com>,
> > >> > 71...@debbugs.gnu.org
> > >> >
> > >> > Sorry Eli,
> > >> >
> > >> > I had replied, but forgot to CC the list :-)
> >
> > I suspect that if you make this mistake and correct it afterwards the
> > entire thread will be classified as spam...
> >
> > >> > What I was saying was: of course I can remove the bindings from the
> > >> > map myself (& indeed that’s what I've
> > >> > done), but my point is why should I have to?
> > >> > Why is a feature that’s turned off still having an effect? I think
> > >> > this is unnecessary and surprising to users (at
> > >> > least it was to me)!
> > >> >
> > >> > I was thinking this paging animation feature might be better as it’s
> > >> > own minor mode, which would do the right
> > >> > thing with keymaps and is how the other features in the same file are
> > >> > implemented?
> >
> > Yes, but that ship sailed with the release of Emacs 29. It's too late
> > to change any of these mechanics.
>
> So should we close this bug as wontfix, then?
>
>
>
>
