>>>>> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:32:46 +0000, Philip Kaludercic
>>>>> <[email protected]> said:
>>
>> Is it worth allowing a user-specified function?
Philip> That would be possible as well, but to make it manageable with the
Philip> current approach the function would have to be one that moves the
point.
Philip> So we could rewrite the patch with two default options
`backward-word'
Philip> and `unix-backward-word' (which we would have to add), but I am not
sure
Philip> it would have much use. Perhaps killing the current word, instead
of
Philip> just killing to the beginning?
You mean having all the option values be functions? That would work as
well, but was not what I was suggesting.
In any case, I canʼt find a strong justification for such
configurability. We can always add it in later if people ask for it.
Robert
--
