> From: Robert Pluim <rpl...@gmail.com> > Cc: Philip Kaludercic <phil...@posteo.net>, r...@gnu.org, > 69...@debbugs.gnu.org, j...@linkov.net, stefankan...@gmail.com, > acora...@gnu.org, spwhit...@spwhitton.name > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 15:53:39 +0200 > > >>>>> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 15:21:54 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> said: > > >> From: Philip Kaludercic <phil...@posteo.net> > >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>, Stefan Kangas > <stefankan...@gmail.com>, > >> Andrea Corallo <acora...@gnu.org>, j...@linkov.net, r...@gnu.org, > >> 69...@debbugs.gnu.org > >> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 21:12:01 +0000 > >> > >> I had misremembered the last state of this patch. It is easier to just > >> have a tristate option. Here is the updated proposal: > > Eli> Thanks. > > >> +(defcustom kill-word-if-no-region nil > > Eli> I would call this 'kill-region-dwim' instead. > > >> + "Behaviour when `kill-region' is invoked without an active region. > >> +If set to nil (default), then an error occurs and nothing is killed. > If > >> +set to `emacs-word', then kill a the last word as defined by the > current > >> +major mode. If set to `unix-word', then kill the last word in the > style > >> +of a shell like Bash, disregarding the major mode." > >> + :type '(choice (const :tag "Kill a word like `backward-kill-word'" > emacs-word) > >> + (const :tag "Kill a word like Bash would" unix-word) > >> + (const :tag "Do not kill anything" nil)) > >> + :group 'killing) > > Eli> :version tag is missing. > > Is it worth allowing a user-specified function?
I don't understand what you are asking, sorry. Allow a function where and to do what?
