Collin Funk <collin.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Oh, right. Thanks. I installed the attached further patch to fix that.
>> This is cleaner anyway.
>
> This test still fails on cfarm110 for me, logs attached.
>
> I was looking at it the other day, but was unable to get a working
> version.
>
> I'll see if I have any ideas later.
I think I see the issue now. Using this test program:
$ cat main.c
#include <stdio.h>
int
main (void)
{
long double a = 2.225073858507201383090232717332e-308;
long double b = 2.2250738585072014e-308;
printf ("a < b: %d\n", a < b);
printf ("a > b: %d\n", a > b);
printf ("a == b: %d\n", a == b);
return 0;
}
$ gcc main.c
$ ./a.out
a < b: 0
a > b: 0
a == b: 1
And then in gdb we can see strtold returns equal numbers:
Breakpoint 1, general_numcompare (sa=0x10051460
"2.225073858507201383090232717332e-308", sb=0x10051486
"2.2250738585072014e-308") at src/sort.c:2032
2032 long double a = strtold (sa, &ea);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install
glibc-2.17-326.el7_9.3.ppc64
(gdb) n
2033 long double b = strtold (sb, &eb);
(gdb) n
2036 if (sa == ea)
(gdb) print a
$1 = 2.2250738585072013830902327173324041e-308
(gdb) print b
$2 = 2.2250738585072013830902327173324041e-308
(gdb) print a == b
$3 = 1
Maybe a solution would be to compare the strings instead of calling
strold? I guess that would make life harder though...
Collin
