Am 10.07.25 um 19:20 schrieb Paul Eggert:
Thanks for reporting that false positive in the test. I installed the attached patch, which should fix things.
The patch fixes the error with the long fraction part being unparsable, but it seems like the resulting order for the test input is still wrong. The LDBL_MIN fraction is longer than the DBL_MIN fraction, so it appears as a bigger number to test/expr, and the <= comparison fails.
↪ expr 225073858507201383090232717332 '<=' 2250738585072014 >/dev/null; echo $?
1So the function still determines that DBL_MIN < LDBL_MIN, and the test fails due to exp != out. Maybe the two fractions could be cropped/padded with 0's to have the same length, or all of these comparisons / the expected output generation in general could be done in C?
- Cosima
publickey - opna2608@protonmail.com - 0xC802C863.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
