Paul Eggert wrote:
The Wanderer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
common English usage suggests that the old behaviour is correct.
I suppose you might be able to talk me into that, but in that case we
need to fix the code and the documentation both. Any volunteers?
I don't have the time at present to figure out how to do either one
properly, but if it remains undone at such time as I do have the time to
spare I'd be willing to give it a go. Am I correct in understanding that
by "fix the documentation" you mean "rephrase the documentation such
that it describes the old behaviour rather than the new"?
--
The Wanderer
Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.
Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.
_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
