> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:44:22PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > > Yes, I'd say a new one. It's more of a pain, but it's the "right way" > > to do it. > > Perhaps the following patch is acceptable?
Hello, Is there any feedback or progress related to this patch? I'm very eagerly awaiting a copy patched in this manner, as it really helps the remote filesystem our group is working on (i.e. PVFS2) and generally makes more sense to me. While the implementation may need work, I'd like to see it through to inclusion if possible. Please let me know if there are more steps that need to be taken. Best regards, -Neill. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
