https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33177
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- >> That testsuite finds some issues that I need to investigate in detail, >> but passes when the tests are linked with Solaris ld. > > One thing (maybe the only one) is that the gld-created objects lack > _etext in .symtab and .dynsym. The rest (_edata, _end) are already there. One more thing: shared objects lack _etext, _edata, and _end completely. Symbol versioning is correct. There are ordering differences in the pvs -dsvo output: * ld: solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so [BASE]; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _etext; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _end; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _edata; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _DYNAMIC; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS: basevers; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS: BASEVERS; * gld: solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so [BASE]; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _DYNAMIC; solaris-basevers.so - solaris-basevers.so: _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS: BASEVERS; solaris-basevers.so - BASEVERS: basevers; I suspect they are benign, though. Ali? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
