https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18561
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Rich,
> Indeed, that fixes it. However I'm skeptical of the way you're making the
> change:
Me too - it was just a suggestion.
> 1. S_FORCE_RELOC already has logic to force relocations for weak symbols
> when the strict argument is nonzero, so I wonder if something is wrongly
> calling it with strict=0 instead of strict=1?
This seems likely, although I have to wonder - why is this bug only surfacing
now ? Surely a problem like this, if it is generic, should have been
encountered a long time ago.
> 2. Resolving the value of a weak symbol at as-time is always wrong,
True. So maybe what we need is a patch to S_FORCE_RELOC to always force
relocations for weak symbols... I will try one out locally and see if it
works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
