https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18561
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> --- Indeed, that fixes it. However I'm skeptical of the way you're making the change: 1. S_FORCE_RELOC already has logic to force relocations for weak symbols when the strict argument is nonzero, so I wonder if something is wrongly calling it with strict=0 instead of strict=1? 2. Resolving the value of a weak symbol at as-time is always wrong, regardless of target or 'strictness' (whatever that's intended to mean). If the bug were in an sh-specific file, I would be satisfied with an sh-specific fix, but since it seems to be in symbol.c, this may indicate a bug that's affecting other targets too, and that should be fixed globally rather than via a target-specific optional macro. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
