http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, hp at sourceware dot org wrote: > * Git migrations and work-flow offered for remaining projects > (like newlib and cgen). That should be in the form: document in detail how the migration worked, so that if the newlib community chooses to move to git, it has the benefit of documentation of the process when replicating it to move to its own git repository. > * (related:) Do not set in stone this git repo as "binutils+gdb" > in any documentation changes and names assuming we agree that other projects > may be added. Rather, I say the repository should be exactly 6(b) from <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00486.html> (subject to confirming the exact set of directories with only Attic contents in CVS whose history gets converted). (c), (d), (e), (f), (g) and each of the three parts of (h) should, if someone in their respective communities wishes to convert them away from CVS, be converted independently to separate repositories (based on shared toplevel code only when it's actually used); (a) may be convenient to avoid shared files diverging, but is not required. (I do not definitively assert whether (c) newlib and (d) winsup should be separate or a single repository; that's for the relevant communities to work out. I am confident that all the other divisions make sense.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
