Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20250204231325.B4BPBm8Q@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Robert Elz wrote in
| <6584.1738633...@jacaranda.noi.kre.to>:
|| Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 19:00:28 -0500
|| From: Zeffie via Bug reports for the GNU Bourne Again SHell \
|| <bug-bash@gnu.org>
|| Message-ID: <875b2e87e5d847a4aa04ba2b31bec...@zeffie.com>
| ...
||| The debug headers indicate an "Invalid DKIM signature" which appears
||| to be causing the posts to be flagged.
||
||That's because the From header is being changed by the list to work
||around some other "spam protection" mechanism that lots of people seem
|
|However, dear Robert, since DKIM prefers looking at a signature
|which matches the domain present in the first address of From:,
|only that is the right thing to do if you do change the message.
|The NetBSD lists have chosen not to change messages, so that the
|original DKIM signature still verifies, which is the other
|approach. (I however do not like it since i love those [TAG]
|things, and it all would be no problem for user interfaces *if
|only* the MUAs would start using RFC 9057 Author: as "the real
|thing" in From: (not to talk about Sender:), if present.)
I want to add a note of Dave Crocker ("*that* email" Dave
Crocker):
Note that a message sent to a mailing list is addressed to
a mailing list. It is not addressed to the 'final' recipients.
That additional addressing is done by the mailing list, not the
original author. This is a rather stark demonstration that the
intermediary has taken delivery and then re-posted the message.
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
|
|In Fall and Winter, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s pint(er).
|
|The banded bear
|without a care,
|Banged on himself for e'er and e'er
|
|Farewell, dear collar bear
