On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 12:07:55 -0800, Wiley Young wrote: > No, it isn't that the sentence could be read that way, it's that the > sentence can't not be read that way. It's ambiguous.
Do you know what "ambiguous" means? It literally means that something can be interpreted in multiple ways. So, if a sentence is ambiguous, then your assertion that it "can't not be read that way" must be false. Anyway, there have been new wording proposals already. It's up to Chet whether they'll be accepted. Anything more you have to say on the topic will need to be specific, and not this generalized, self-contradictory academic nonsense.
