Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/06/2013 07:04, Linda Walsh ha scritto:
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> The world is larger than glibc and the glibc locale definitions. We need
>> a solution that encompasses all of it. That solution should, and maybe
>> will, include glibc, but that is not sufficient by itself.
> ----
> I don't suppose it is possible to use the Unicode
> collation order when using unicode?
When matching regular expressions, people usually want to treat case
specially; for example [A-E] should exclude lowercase a/b/c/d/e.
Unfortunately, this is not the case when collating other things. The
Unicode collation standard in fact says ("1.1 Multi-Level Comparison"):
Case differences (uppercase versus lowercase), are typically
ignored, if the base letters or their accents differ
That's not the unicode algorithm I referred to.
A-Z < a-z in the one I referred to.
The ordering looks very similar to 'C' with extensions to cover
accents... but the case for latin letterin in particular was ordered just as in
the 'C' local.
