On 6/27/13 3:33 AM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> Hi Paolo.
>
>> I still believe that there is no place other than the glibc locale
>> descriptions where this can be fixed.
>
> This is necessary but not sufficient. All of gawk, grep, sed and bash
> run on lots of non-GLIBC systems. The locale definitions, even for
> the same locale, vary wildly out in the wild. Therefore there's no
> other practical choice but to fix each program to provide Rational
> Range Interpretation.
This is correct. I am interested in bash behaving consistently across all
platforms where it runs. Modifying glibc's locale descriptions doesn't
have much, or at least not enough, to do with that.
> Fortunately, gawk and grep are already there, and I think the sed in
> the git repo is as well. Once Bash turns this on as default, the
> world will definitely be a better place, independent of GLIBC.
The world is larger than glibc and the glibc locale definitions. We need
a solution that encompasses all of it. That solution should, and maybe
will, include glibc, but that is not sufficient by itself.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
