On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 09/27/11 03:31, Philip Hazel wrote: > > The change looks innocuous to me > > I worry that the change could mask the real bug > (which may lie elsewhere). For example, it could > be that the previous line's backslash was interpreted > incorrectly. Can you find out from the original user > what the values of $ac_delim_n and $ac_delim_num were, > thus explaining why the change was needed?
Paul, Thanks for your reply. I've forwarded your message to Valts Silaputnins <val...@gmail.com> so that he can reply directly ... it seems silly to channel the conversation through me. Regards, Philip -- Philip Hazel
