On 09/27/11 03:31, Philip Hazel wrote: > The change looks innocuous to me
I worry that the change could mask the real bug (which may lie elsewhere). For example, it could be that the previous line's backslash was interpreted incorrectly. Can you find out from the original user what the values of $ac_delim_n and $ac_delim_num were, thus explaining why the change was needed?
