Since .dylib is the standard extension for libraries on OSX, it's probably
a better idea to have an #ifdef that checks for the operating system and
chooses the correct extension based on it.

If you ever wish to support Windows in the future, they use .DLL.

On 2 July 2018 at 22:15, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>
wrote:

> Hi Xiao-Yong,
>
> true, but *lib_file_i**o* has been replaced by *⎕FIO* and will be removed
> in the near future.
>
>  I would also suppose that *lib_file_io.dylib* can be renamed to
> *lib_file_io.**so* after building it.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 07/02/2018 03:44 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>
> I haven't checked.
> But having lib_file_io.dylib instead of lib_file_io.so might create problems 
> with ⎕FX which uses dlopen.
>
> Can you check
>
>       'lib_file_io.so' ⎕FX 'FILE_IO'
>
> and subsequent FILE_IO functionalities still work or not?
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 5:33 PM, Peter Teeson <peter.tee...@icloud.com> 
> <peter.tee...@icloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jürgen:
>
> Good news…. That seems to have worked.
> I deleted the /usr/local/lib/apl dir as well as the /usr/local/include/apl dir
>
> In my case I had to install the following auto tools:
> autoconf-2.69 libtool-2.4.6  automake-1.15
>
> Then Gandalf:~ pteeson$ svn co http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/svn/apl/trunk 
> gnuapl
>
> Then followed items 1-5 per your instructions.
>
> Then Gandalf:~ pteeson$ ls /usr/local/lib/apl
> lib_file_io.0.dylib   lib_template_F12.0.dylib         libapl.0.dylib
> lib_file_io.a         lib_template_F12.a               libapl.a
> lib_file_io.dylib             lib_template_F12.dylib   
> libapl.dyliblib_file_io.la             lib_template_F12.la              
> libapl.la
> lib_sql.0.dylib               lib_template_OP1.0.dylib libemacs.0.dylib
> lib_sql.a                     lib_template_OP1.a       libemacs.a
> lib_sql.dylib         lib_template_OP1.dylib   libemacs.dyliblib_sql.la       
>                 lib_template_OP1.la      libemacs.la
> lib_template_F0.0.dylib       lib_template_OP2.0.dylib        workspaces
> lib_template_F0.a             lib_template_OP2.a              wslib3
> lib_template_F0.dylib lib_template_OP2.dylib          wslib4
> lib_template_F0.la            lib_template_OP2.la             wslib5
>
> Note that some of the .dylibs have version numbers as part of the lib name.
> This conforms to Apple’s Dynamic Libraries Programming Topics documentation
>
> So far so good… I will now proceed with the original experiment….
>
> Thanks for the help and support…..
>
> respect….
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Juergen Sauermann 
> <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> if I compare the rules in Makefile.am for the libraries mentioned below, then 
> it seems
> like there is one line which sets the xxx_la_LDFLAGS for those libraries xxx 
> that then fail
> to properly build the dylibs. Removing that line may fix your problem (it may 
> create
> others but we willl see),
>
> Please try the following:
>
> 1. remove the line that reads:
>
> lib_file_io_la_LDFLAGS = -avoid-version -module -shared -export-dynamic
>
> from file src/native/Makefile.am
>
>
> 2. remove the line that reads:
>
> libapl_la_LDFLAGS += -avoid-version -module -shared -export-dynamic
>
> from file src/Makefile.am
>
>
> 3. run command autoreconf in the top-level directory (the one that has the 
> subdir named src). That
> creates a fresh Makefile.in file for every Makefile.am,
>
>
> 4. run ./configure --with-libapl
>
>
> 5. run make and  sudo make install
>
>
> It may or may not be necessary to run make clean before step 5 in the src and 
> src/native.directories if
> there should be stale .la files.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 06/29/2018 07:52 PM, Peter Teeson wrote:
>
> Hi Jürgen:
> Sorry for delayed reply I was AFK.
> I just now did the following:
> (0) Made a new partition (logical volume) and
>       installed macOS Yosemite 10.10.5
>       installed Command LineTools (Apple's package of ld, libel, make, gcc, 
> etc, etc)
> (1) Checked out svn1053 in new dir gnuapl in my home dir
>       Gandalf:~ pteeson$ pwd /Users/pteeson
>       Gandalf:~ pteeson$ svn co http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/svn/apl/trunk
>  gnuapl
> (2)   Gandalf:~ pteeson$ cd gnuapl
> (3)   Gandalf:gnuapl pteeson$ ./configure --with-libapl
> checking for gcc... gcc
> …...
> (4) make
>       Gandalf:gnuapl pteeson$ make 
> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make  all-recursive
>       Making all in build
> …..
>
>
>       libtool: link: g++ -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup -o .libs/libapl.so 
> -bundle ,,,,,
> (5) sudo make install
>       libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libapl.so 
> /usr/local/lib/apl/libapl.so
>
> So  completely vanilla, out of the box, build.
>
> Gandalf:gnuapl pteeson$ ls /usr/local/lib/apllib_file_io.la                   
>         lib_template_OP1.dylib
> lib_file_io.so                                lib_template_OP1.la
> lib_sql.0.dylib                               lib_template_OP2.0.dylib
> lib_sql.a                                     lib_template_OP2.a
> lib_sql.dylib                         lib_template_OP2.dyliblib_sql.la        
>                                 lib_template_OP2.la
> lib_template_F0.0.dylib               libapl.la
> lib_template_F0.a                     libapl.so
> lib_template_F0.dylib         libemacs.0.dylib
> lib_template_F0.la                    libemacs.a
> lib_template_F12.0.dylib              libemacs.dylib
> lib_template_F12.a                    libemacs.la
> lib_template_F12.dylib                workspaces
> lib_template_F12.la                   wslib3
> lib_template_OP1.0.dylib      wslib4
> lib_template_OP1.a            wslib5
>
> What I find interesting is that most of the libraries are either .a, .la,  or 
> .dylib.
> But the exceptions are lib_file_io.so and libapl.so
>
> So the gnuapl package, as a checked out, knows how to make .dylibs.
> It’s just those two that seem to have a problem.
>
> How do we figure out what we need to do to fix them?
>
> BTW I have the complete Terminal output saved if we need to dig into it.
>
> respect….
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to