If you get it to compile under Windows, you might want to try using
gnu-apl-mode <https://github.com/lokedhs/gnu-apl-mode> under Emacs on
Windows
<https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/efaq-w32/index.html>.
That should take care of issues relating to keymaps and fonts, as well as
providing a nicer environment to work in.

Regards,
Elias

On 2 November 2015 at 12:38, Richard Levine <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Elias and Blake for your thoughtful replies which have given me
> more insight into the matter, and brought up a number of great points (:>)
>
>
>
> First, my immediate goal is to get GNU APL running under Windows.  Here’s
> my alternatives so far -
>
> ·         APL.exe – Explore using apl.exe with xterm under Cygwin. (See
> Juergen’s note, in another email) I will report on my success.
>
> o   Has anyone else done it this way?
>
> ·         Under Cygwin looks like I need to follow “the usual configure /
> make” process. Looks like I’ll have to work on this.
>
> o   Is there any specific documentation on this? (PS – I’m not asking
> people to write this for me if it doesn’t exist, just, where is it?) Has
> anyone made up some “cheat sheet” for this, etc?
>
>
>
> If it’s worth running GNU APL under Windows, I’m happy to help write up
> some documentation, but as mentioned, I’d be interested in getting a sense
> of how many people would be interested, besides myself,  and it is best if
> it fits into the objective(s) of the GNU APL Project.
>
>
>
> I guess I have to ask – what is the objective of the GNU APL Project? And
> to further the objective, what are the targeted platforms?
>
>
>
> Is Windows is a target platform for GNU APL? In other words, is having
> Windows a target platform an objective of the GNU APL Project? I presumed
> it was, as a solid freely available “APL2 clone” , that is, one following
> ISO Standard Extended APL, available to the computing community , is
> actually a unique offering in today’s APL world.
>
>
>
> For example, the objective of the NARS2000 project is clearly stated in
> home page of the web site (www.nars2000.org): “The goal of this effort …
> is to foster new ideas about the [APL] language and its implementation.” To
> further this goal, the NARS2000 interpreter is freely available as a 32- or
> 64-bit Windows-based executable, initially designed to run on Windows XP,
> Vista, and Windows 7, and they claim it will run under other operating
> systems, such as Linux using Wine.
>
>
>
> Notwithstanding that Linux is a wonderful system, which I totally agree
> with, there’s an awful lot of Windows users and systems out there, not just
> me!  The Windows audience is huge, after all, that’s why Cygwin exists, I
> suppose (:>)
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Richard Levine
>
> Professor, School of Computer Technology, George Brown College
>
> 416-460-6499
>
>
>

Reply via email to