On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Daniel Kalchev <dan...@digsys.bg> wrote:
>
> By the way, I just checked two of my routers, and it seems I am reaching the 
> current BSDRP limit:
>
> router1:
>
> 229742/4768/234510 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> 229320/3006/232326/262144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
> 229320/3000 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
> 516096K/8320K/524416K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
> 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
> 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k)
>
> router2:
>
> 229352/22678/252030 mbufs in use (current/cache/total)
> 229324/18988/248312/262144 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max)
> 229324/6321 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache)
> 515986K/43645K/559632K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total)
> 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)
>
> Both have 12 igb interfaces.


Hi Daniel,

with 12 igb interfaces… you need a lot's of mbuf.
But on your output I didn't see any "requests for mbufs denied".

What's the output of:
vmstat -z | head -1 ; vmstat -z | grep -i mbuf
  => If there is no "FAIL" counter, it should be OK

What about the throughput (in pps) that you reach with your setup ?

Regards,

Olivier

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Bsdrp-users mailing list
Bsdrp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bsdrp-users

Reply via email to