Shérab, on Tue 17 Nov 2015 15:26:25 +0100, wrote: > I was just wondering whether it wouldn't e > possible to improve r enrich AT-SPI to make it more suitable for > terminals, my concern being to avoid having too many standards and APIs > around. But if you think it's best to just have another API besides, I > am fine.
It's also a question of dependencies. bterms will probably be fine with implementing a shared-memory segment if it's simple enough. They will much less like to either implement the whole complexity of at-spi requests, or depend on a library that implements it (atk, and thus glib). Samuel _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
