Samuel Thibault (2015/11/17 15:15 +0100): > It is heavy for performance (at *best* thousands of requests > per second), and it is really not suited to getting terminal > information. The AccessibleTerminal interface has never been actually > implemented. > > Generally speaking, the way AT-SPI works seems overkill to me here. The > way it works (insertion/removal notification) really does not suit > terminal screen reading. > > A shared-memory solution looking like /dev/vcsa, but rethought for > unicode etc. would work much better.
Sure, I et your point. I was just wondering whether it wouldn't e possible to improve r enrich AT-SPI to make it more suitable for terminals, my concern being to avoid having too many standards and APIs around. But if you think it's best to just have another API besides, I am fine. Shérab. _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
