Dave Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we use contraction tables in place of the strictly one-to-one text tables, > what are your collective thoughts on the one major difference that > contraction > table support splits braille windows on word boundaries whereas text table > support doesn't?
As stated earlier, I think the "one character per cell" idiom also holds here. If there are characters at position 40, I want to see them. IIUC, splitting at word boundaries would mean (I never really used contracted braille) that if a word doesnt fit at the end of the display, it will not be displayed there. I dont like this, not at all. We could probably invent an opcode to enable/disable this behaviour per table? -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
