On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Dave Mielke wrote: > The only significant component of brltty which isn't yet Unicode-based is the > text tables support. What do you people think of getting rid of them and just > using contraction tables (whetther or not we eventually rename them is > another > topic)? We could simply convert our current text tables into equivalent > contraction tables.
What is there to gain by doing so? Note that I think that text tables should indeed be UTF-8 based. But their simplicity and obviousness is worth keeping around I would say, especially if contracted braille can be configured out to slim down the BRLTTY binary. Nicolas _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
