> Not in school, and not in science class. In comparative religion, > maybe, but it's hard enough to teach good science without adding a > load of creation myths to the course.
I agree, not is science class, and I did specifically say that it shouldn't be taught as an "equal" alternative. Creationism should be taught from an historical perspective. It played a significant part in history, religion and society - but your right, that debate isn't appropriate in science class. > And that's the issue - "Both > sides"? No - because if they allow "both sides" they have to > allow ALL sides. That means Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Aboriginal... > If you really wanted to cover what EVERY religion says about > creation, there wouldn't be time for any science at all. > Charlie. You forgot to mention the other viable alternative to evolution: the Flying Spaghetti Monster :-) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
