----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 3:13 AM
Subject: Re: Technically reality


> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:06:43 -0800, Dan Minettte 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>> > Do you stand by the assertion that the technicality is the only
>>> reality?
>>>
>>>  In this case, yes, of course. What other reality is there?
>>
>> The one illustrated by my examples: the highly probable empirically
>> observable effects.  For example, Jim Crow laws didn't, 
>> technically,
>> address the civil rights of blacks...just those people whose 
>> ancestors
>> were black.  The fact that there is a 100% correlation between the 
>> two
>> is irrelevant, in a technical sense.
>>
>> It's an interesting way of looking at things.  I just don't think 
>> it is a
>> helpful way of understanding empirical phenomenon.  It doesn't help 
>> us
>> model present observations and predict future observations. If that
>> isn't your
>> goal, then using the most technical sense is reasonable, but I 
>> think it
>> was Ronn's goal.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something here, I apologize in advance if that's 
> the
> case.  It seems to me that Dan is belaboring the technicality here - 
> the
> fact that there was no mention of how the handicapped would be 
> provided
> for.  Isn't it rather silly to assume that if a city adopted a car 
> free
> policy that they wouldn't make provisions for the handicapped?  I 
> don't
> know what the laws are regarding the handicapped in the U.K. but I'm
> relatively certain that you _couldn't_ do it in the U.S.
>
> Another perspective; If a city or a country, with the approval of 
> the
> general public, decided that it was in their best interests to 
> dismantle a
> segment of their infrastructure, is it reasonable to expect that 
> that
> infrastructure should be preserved for a tiny minority of that 
> public?
>
>
Would you consider the handicapped to be a tiny minority?

But I think it is safe to assume that London is not proposing 
dismantling of infrastructure, just restrictions on use.


xponent
Off The Point Maru
rob



_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to