> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of jon louis mann
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:21 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Another one bites the dust.
> 
> > Since, according to most polls, Congress's approval rating is below
> > Bush's,  they are not in much of a position to call him on the
> carpet.
> 
> > According to the latest poll at pollingreport.com, Americans oppose
> > impeachment by almost a 2-1 margin.
> 
> > Dan M.
> 
> i disagree dan; i think congress's approval rating is low because the
> dems have NOT been able to stop the war and hold bushco accountable.
> jon m.

Are you saying the poll is wrong?  If so, what do you base your
understanding of public sentiment on?  Do you have other data?

It's true that most people want to start a withdrawal.  But, at the same
time, most people are opposed to Congress withholding funding for the war.  

I don't doubt that many/most liberal Democrats want the Democratic Congress
to force Bush's hand on Iraq by simply refusing to fund the war.  But, this
would result in Congress ignoring the will of the American people.  Quoting
the Christian Science Monitor from the time of the voting:

<quote>
Asked who should have the final say about troop levels in Iraq, 57 percent
say it should be Congress; only 35 percent say it should be the president,
according to the same poll. But pressed to say whether Congress should
continue withholding funding after a presidential veto until the president
yields, only 36 percent supported that idea and 56 percent opposed it. 
<end quote>

I've seen a number of polls that indicate this general trend.  Also, I think
it is fair to say that the president would play politics with this, and
extend the deployment until money would have to be allocated simply to pay
the troops in Iraq; provide them with necessary equipment, etc.  It was a no
win situation for the Democrats.

Dan M. 




_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to